For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the judgment of the first instance court that found the Defendant guilty on each of the larcenys in the instant facts charged, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the record, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the rules of reinforcement of confession.

The prosecutor also appealed the guilty portion of the judgment of the court below, but the appellate brief does not state the grounds for objection to this part.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.