2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes; and (b) KRW 6 million out of the money that the Defendant acquired by deception from the injured party was immediately remitted to him upon the request of the case E; and (c) the Defendant is not all used.

However, the court below did not take any measures to repay damages to 7.7 million won in total until the appellate court, and the defendant committed the crime of this case again in spite of the fact that he had been punished twice by a fine for the same kind of crime, and considering all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records of this case and the theory of changes, considering the economic situation of the defendant, even if considering the economic situation of the defendant, it is judged that the sentence imposed by the court below is appropriate, and it is so excessive that the defendant exceeded the scope of reasonable discretion.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.