2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. On October 16, 2014, the Plaintiffs entered into a sales contract with the Defendant on the purchase price of KRW 259,50,000 with respect to the Daegu Suwon-gu D, 102 Dong 1802 (hereinafter “instant apartment”) owned by the Defendant as a husband and wife, and the major contents thereof are as follows.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant contract”) < Amended by Act No. 1273, Jan. 9, 2015> < Amended by Act No. 1781, Jan. 1, 2015> - 26,000,000 won - intermediate payment - 20,000 won (payment on November 28, 2014) - Any balance - 213,50,000 won (payment on November 28, 2014) - Where a seller or buyer fails to perform the terms of this contract, the other party may notify in writing the person who has failed to perform the contract and rescind the contract.

In addition, the parties to the contract may claim damages from the other party due to the cancellation of contract respectively, and the contract deposit shall be considered as compensation for damages, unless otherwise agreed.

Matters with special agreement.

1. Some of the down payment 3,00,000 won shall be paid in gold, and the remaining 23,000,000 won shall be the remitted money to the seller’s account on October 17, 2014.

3.The management fees shall be settled separately. 4. Other ordinary practices.

B. On December 31, 1992, the apartment building of this case was registered for preservation, and 20 years have passed at the time of the contract of this case. On June 8, 201, the Defendant purchased the apartment building of this case with the extension of the north bank room (hereinafter “the instant room”) on June 8, 201, and subsequently lived with additional repairs, such as the replacement of singckes, the replacement of each room, the repair of toilets, the installation of the cell room building, the building of the cell-to-door room building, and the replacement of the shower at the inside bank and the north bank.

C. On October 11, 2014, before the instant contract, Plaintiff B first visited the instant apartment and responded to the Defendant that “the house is not in frozen or frozen,” and the Defendant responded to “the male light is hot.”

On the next day, the plaintiffs' apartment of this case.