When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 31, 2017, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Gwangju District Court.

On November 23, 2019, at around 07:55, the Defendant driven a knife car with a blood alcohol content of about 0.105% from around 300 meters away from the road in front of a restaurant where it is impossible to find out the trade name less than the Korean Poppy-gun, Jeonnam-gun, the Defendant driven a knife car with a blood alcohol content of about 0.105% in the same Eup/Myeon.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Criminal place, notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, report on the circumstance of a drinking driver, report on the situation of a drinking driver, report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, investigation report on the actual condition of a traffic accident, investigation report (Listening to the C Telephone statement of a witness);

1. On board, the records of the management and inquiry of the historical launch report, and the motor vehicle inspection records and CDs for motor vehicles witnesses in the driver's license register;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports (verification of the same kind of criminal records), and application of summary order statutes;

1. The relevant provision of criminal facts, Articles 148-2(1) and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act of the choice of a fine, the danger and harm of the operation of a motor vehicle, which are highly serious, the degree of blood alcohol level at the time of the occurrence of an accident that meets the speed of the witness at a rapid speed. If the witness did not timely discover a motor vehicle of the defendant who does not take the speed at the time, the crime is heavy in light of the circumstances such as the situation that the witness's failure to take the speed is obvious to lead to the accident of human life, and the fact that the interval between the previous criminal records and the previous criminal records is so short that there is a high possibility of criticism, but the defendant was a physical accident that is partially damaged by the date of the judgment. The defendant's vehicle is covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and there is no previous conviction except for the previous criminal records, and the defendant's judgment of the suspension of the execution.