beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.24 2014고정2690

개인정보보호법위반

Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the chief director of the D Credit Union established for the purpose of credit business, etc. from February 27, 2012 to May 1, 2014, and is a person who represents the credit union and has overall control over the business. E is a person who assist the chief director from January 27, 2017 to January 1, 1997 and has overall control over the overall business affairs. Defendant B is a director of F, an incorporated foundation established for the purpose of medical business, etc.

1. On July 201, 2013, Defendant A and E received a request from the FF director B of an incorporated foundation, who was aware that the Defendant was going to the same gender, to send a notice of the above FF’s fee-charging health examination to the members of the relevant association by mail. As such, the Defendant and E received a request from the FF director B of the incorporated foundation, who was aware that the Defendant was going to the same gender.

E On July 3, 2013, after obtaining the approval of the defendant from the above credit cooperative office, the above credit cooperative members 3,378 name and address were stored to the above credit cooperative members 3,378.

In collusion with E, the Defendant provided his personal information to a third party without the consent of 3,378 members of the said new union, a subject of information.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the same time and place as that of paragraph (1) above, received 3,378 name and address of the union members and 3,378 union members in accordance with paragraph (1) from said A and E.

As a result, the Defendant was provided with personal information with knowledge of the fact that he did not obtain the consent of 3,378 members of the said credit union.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of interrogation of the Defendants (including part of the interrogation record, No. 224, 242)

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against E and Defendant A;

1. The police statement of H;

1. (Seoul)D Newcomforts, etc., investigation reports (verification of the F Status as Incorporated Foundation), F Copy of the corporate register as Incorporated Foundation and F Internet.