A evidence No. 1 shall be forfeited from the defendant, and 336,00 won shall be additionally collected.

The Bosishing organization, which is managed by the general responsibility of name inception, is an organization composed of inducements by deceiving the victims of unspecified number of victims by telephone, misrepresenting them to an investigation agency and making a false statement of the fact that they were involved in an offense, solicitations of large-scale accounts through which victims are recruited, withdrawals of damages deposited in the large account, and withdrawals of remittances from the large account.

The Defendant was aware of around February 2017 from China.

Upon receiving a proposal from C to give 6% of the withdrawal amount from the face of the withdrawal of money from C, the said organization would be responsible for withdrawal.

The Defendant and the nameless Bosing staff of the Defendant delivered a physical card that is linked to the large account to the Defendant and the Defendant waiting to withdraw when the Defendant was waiting to withdraw the account, the inducement policy made the victim by deceiving the victim and deposited the amount of damage into the large account in order to withdraw it and deliver it to the organization.

On February 28, 2017, the above organization's nameless inducement plan was made by phone call to the victim D and was misrepresented with the central inspection by the Seoul central government. "E is opening two passbooks in the name of D and preventing fraud."

D Transfer of money to an account that you know as to whether or not a victim is a victim.

‘Falsely speaking, the victim made the victim transfer KRW 5,60,000 to the Agricultural G account in the name of F, the Grand Account.

On the same day, the Defendant opened a national bank opened Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government at another branch, withdrawn the above KRW 5.6 million from the e-mail card connected to the said account with the order of the said organization, and remitted it to the said organization by means of remittance without passbook.

As such, the Defendant, in collusion with the employees of the phishing type, acquired 5.6 million won from the damaged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. D. D.