beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.05.11 2017누35495

부당해고구제재심판정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim is justifiable even if the Plaintiff’s appeal is not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial, and all of the evidence submitted in the first instance trial are examined. In conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the Plaintiff’s appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.