The non-Dongs of the buildings listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant building”) in E.S. shall be leased as KRW 3 million during the period from May 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015, and the monthly rent of KRW 12,68.40,000, in August 2014, among the 12,668.40 square meters of the 1st floor of the instant building moving to the Defendant A.S., the part inside the instant building connected each point of the 826.45 square meters in sequence from September 1, 2014 to February 28, 2015, and the Defendants leased the leased property as of the date of closing the argument.

Since each of the above lease agreements terminated upon the expiration of the term, the Defendants are obligated to deliver the leased object to the Plaintiff.

2. As to the claim of Defendant A-D Construction Co., Ltd. regarding the claim of Defendant A-D Construction Co., Ltd., the Plaintiff did not notify in writing the Plaintiff of his/her intent to terminate or change the term of the contract one month prior to the expiration of the term of the lease. Therefore, if both parties of the lease do not notify in writing the Plaintiff of his/her intent to terminate or change the term of the contract one month prior to the expiration of the term of the lease, the term

The claim that the lease contract has been renewed under this chapter.

However, according to the evidence No. 6, it is recognized that the Plaintiff notified the termination of the lease contract (pre-determined) to the Defendant A Branch Construction Co., Ltd. on December 8, 2014, which was one month before the expiration of the lease term, and notified the return of the leased object.

Therefore, the assertion of Defendant A-B Corporation that was premised on the Plaintiff’s failure to give such notice is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the claim of this case is accepted on the ground of the reasons.