However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year at the Busan District Court for the crime of acquiring stolen goods, and on February 22, 2014, the said judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2013. 11. 17 03:46경 대구 중구 B에 있는 C 부근 노상에서 술에 취한 채 피해자 D(41세)이 운전하던 E 택시에 승차하여 목적지를 정확하게 말하지 않고 이리로 가라 저리로 가라고 한 것을 피해자가 돌아서 운전한 것으로 오해하고, 같은 날 04:02경 대구 남구 대명로5길 10-46 앞 노상에 이르러 피해자에게 “개새끼! 택시 다 부숴버릴라”라고 욕설을 하며 택시의 조수석 문을 닫지 않고 내리고, 이에 택시에서 내려 조수석 문을 닫는 피해자에게 “개새끼야, 기분 나쁘냐, 죽여버리겠다”라고 욕설을 하며 운전석으로 다가가 운전석 문을 닫지 못하게 한 후 발로 운전석에 앉아있던 피해자의 몸통을 2-3회 차고, 한손으로 피해자의 머리채를 잡고 다른 손 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 4-5회 때려 피해자에게 약 14일간의 치료를 요하는 안면부 좌상 등을 가하였다

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Previous convictions in holding: Inquiries, references to inquiries (43 pages of investigation records), application of each written judgment (47-54 pages of investigation records) or other statutes;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspension of execution, despite the fact that the defendant had been sentenced to a fine of six times due to violent crimes, has committed the instant crime. However, his mistake has been unfolded in depth, the degree of damage to the victim has not been much significant, and the victim has agreed with it. The equity in the case where the defendant was sentenced simultaneously with the crime of latter concurrent crimes under Article 37 of the Criminal Act should be taken into account.