전자금융거래법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On November 14, 2018, the Defendant received a call from a name-free person to the effect that “on the face of sending a physical card, he/she will repeatedly accumulate the transaction performance and execute the loan.” On November 23, 2018, the Defendant sent three copies of the physical card total linked to the name of the Defendant in the name of Cbank (D), the same name E Bank Account (F), and the same name G Union Account (H), respectively, through Kwikset Services Articles. < Amended by Act No. 15014, Nov. 23, 2018>
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A written statement to be prepared;
1. Certificates of deposit;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a.g., telephone investigation and closure of a J course);
1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts;
1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;
1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;
1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: The means of access transferred by the defendant was used for the crimes of licensing.
Many defendants assigned means of access.
A favorable circumstance: The defendant expected an intangible benefit that he/she can get a loan and transferred the means of access. There are reasons to consider the crime as a crime and an motive in particular.
The defendant was not able to take advantage of the crime of this case.
There is no record that the defendant has been punished for the same crime or suspended execution.
Other circumstances, such as the age, character and conduct, the environment, the motive and background of the crime, the result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for the sentencing as shown in the arguments in this case, shall be determined as the sentence as