beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.11.29 2013고단3516

도로법위반

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A around July 19, 2002, which is an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, a violation of vehicle operation restriction on the roads prior to the Ulsan Metropolitan Office. 2. Punishment provisions applicable to a summary order subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [the Constitutional Court Decision 2011Hun-Ga24, October 28, 201, 201, 201Hun-Ga38, 2010Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010, 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009]. Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.