However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On May 31, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol of 0.236% of blood alcohol concentration at around 12:20 on May 31, 2014, and the Defendant was driving a Category C rocketing car from the front day of the Jung-gu Busan, Busan, Busan, to the middle-gu Busan, Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the Busan, the Busan, and the middle-gu, the Busan.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (Article 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (Article 53 and Article 55(1)3 of the same Act (Article 55(1)3 of the same Act applies to a large amount of records that a defendant has been punished for a drunk driving,

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Discretionary Reasons for Discretionary Mitigation);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act concerning orders to provide community service and attend lectures;