A. (1) On October 31, 2012, the Plaintiff leased KRW 5 million to Defendant B by November 25, 2012 on the date of repayment.

(2) Defendant C guaranteed the above obligation.

[Reasons for Recognition] Defendant B: The description of the evidence No. 1 and the purport of the entire pleadings by public notice (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

B. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendants are obligated to pay to each Plaintiff the amount of KRW 50,00,000,000 and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 12% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment as of November 26, 2012, which is the day following the above repayment date, to June 3, 2020; Defendant C is obligated to pay to each Plaintiff the amount of KRW 50,00,000 and the damages for delay calculated from the next day to the day of full payment.

2. Determination as to Defendant C’s assertion

A. As to this, Defendant C is merely a mere mere mere mere surety, and thus, Defendant C has a sufficient means to file a lawsuit first against Defendant B, who is the principal obligor, as a defense for search, and thus, Defendant C has a sufficient means to pay for it to Defendant B.

Defendant C’s above assertion is without merit, inasmuch as there is no evidence to prove that the enforcement thereof is easier.

B. In addition, Defendant C alleged to the effect that part of the payment was made by Defendant C, and there is no evidence to prove that Defendant C performed the payment. Therefore, the above assertion by Defendant C is without merit.

3. In conclusion, each of the plaintiff's claims against the defendants against the defendants is accepted on the grounds of all of them, and it is so decided as per Disposition.