A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

1. Defendant A is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On May 23, 2019, the above Defendant driven the above car and continued to run from the long-distance gate to the front-distance gate in accordance with the two-lanes around the three-lanes near the 3-lane 531-2 of the Seosung-dong, Seosung-gu, Daejeon.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle, such as thoroughly observing the speed limit and keeping it well, etc.

Nevertheless, the above defendant neglected this and went through a speed of more than 20 kilometers a speed of 106 kilometers a speed exceeding a speed of 20 kilometers a speed of 106 kilometers a speed, and caused the victim B (the age of 65)'s driving (the age of 65) driving on the long-distance slope of the long-distance road to the long-distance road.

As a result, the above Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc., in which it is necessary to give approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim B by occupational negligence as above.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving a car of DM3.

On May 23, 2019, the above Defendant driven the above car on May 23, 2019, and continued to proceed with the long-distance flooding from the long-distance flooding side of the street in accordance with the first three-lanes near the flow distance of the Daejeon Pungdong, Seosung-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City, 531-2.

Since the location is an intersection where a signal such as a red on-and-off light is installed, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to pay attention to other motor vehicles and drive the motor vehicle safely after temporarily stopping the stop line or crosswalk immediately before the immediately preceding or the intersection.

Nevertheless, the above defendant neglected to do so and did not reduce the speed of driving in violation of red on-and-off signals, and is Mad by negligence proceeding as it is.