beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.07.10 2019고단274

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 21, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in Daegu District Court and its decision was finalized on June 29, 2018. On November 29, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to four years and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) in the Seog District Court Branch of Daegu District Court and its decision became final and conclusive on March 22, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

In order to ensure domestic means of access and telephone, persons who will deliver secured means of access, etc. through B, persons who will deliver such means of access, persons who will deliver such means of access, etc., persons who will receive the delivered prepaid chips and means of access from bus terminals, etc., and invite persons to create and notify an OTP number necessary for high-amount account transfer, persons who will provide ARS identification, and persons who will provide ARS identification, and send the "communication chips" to those persons, and make them be installed, so that foreign organization members could disguisedly sell the prepaid mobile phone heart chips as if they are sent to normal domestic mobile phone numbers that the victims might know, and by deceiving them to sell the prepaid mobile phone chips to many and unspecified persons as crime target, and then have the victims deposit money to other accounts connected to the means of access already secured, and then have planned to do so.

Therefore, the person in poor name has received the means of access and caused the person to be in charge of the operation of the ARS identification certification necessary for the account transfer and the operation of the "Telecommunications Relay Exchange".

On November 25, 2017, the Defendant received the means of access for prepaid mobile phones and the means of access, which was known to the Defendant as “C,” from the Defendant’s employees of Bophishing, “C,” and “C,” which came to know while following the employment site in order to punish money.