When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the person who constructed the Suwon-si C Apartment, and the victim D is the owner of the above apartment under 701, and the victim E is the owner of the above apartment under 702.

As the Defendant did not receive the construction cost for the above apartment construction, he had the intention to exercise the right of retention by replacing the locking device with the entrance 701 and 702 of the above apartment building and intrusioning it without permission.

1. On March 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 17:00 on March 12, 2014, the Defendant: (b) had the key business operator, who was aware of the Defendant as the lawful owner of the locking locking system in the 701 and 702 of the above apartment house, removed the locking system in the 701 and 702, replaced the Defendant by another one.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the locking device of the 701 suspender No. 701, and the 702 suspender No. 702, the victim E owned by the victim of the city.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, intruded into the said apartment victim D’s residence by opening and entering the replaced lock locking device, as stated in paragraph 1, and then intruded into the said apartment victim E’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the records of this case, that is, the victims occupied and managed each apartment of this case as the owner of each apartment of this case, and the defendant replaced each apartment of this case with a locking device and entered each apartment of this case, it is reasonable to deem that the defendant had a criminal intent to commit property damage and intrusion upon residence.

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. A copy of a written decision on the disposal of real estate name gambling;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 319 of the Criminal Act, respectively, shall apply to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;