However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

While the Defendant, at around 18:10 on July 28, 2013, driven a new village of the Hapyeong-gun, Hapyeong-gun, Hapyeong-gun, a new village of the Hapyeong-do, was driven by B, there are reasonable grounds to recognize that he was driven under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant from the slope C belonging to the Hapan Police Station, such as smelling and smelling red on the face, etc., he did not comply with a police officer’s demand for the measurement of alcohol without justifiable grounds, even though he did not comply with a police officer’s demand for the measurement of alcohol by inserting the breath of alcohol over about 30 minutes

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of a host driver;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act that selects the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., reflective facts of the suspension of execution);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 (1) and (2) of the Probation, etc. Act;