beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.07 2014가단259893

손해배상금

Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Defendant’s basic facts pertaining to the new construction of the Seo-dong Slovag apartment in Busan, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan, between U.S. Co., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “Slsan Co., Ltd.”).

3. A contract was concluded on January 27, 201, and each contract was concluded on April 18, 201 with respect to retaining walls reinforcement works among the construction of a new scarg apartment in the Seo-dong, Seo-gu, Busan (hereinafter “instant chemical construction”) and the construction of a new scarg apartment in the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Busan (hereinafter “each of the instant construction works”). < Amended by Act No. 11448, Jan. 2, 2012; Act No. 10883, May 26, 2011; Act No. 10787, Apr. 18, 2011>

B and the Plaintiff (Appointed; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) were holding a claim for the price of goods (hereinafter “the claim for the price of each of the instant goods”) upon the supply of miscellaneous materials to each of the non-party companies. On September 28, 2012, upon filing an application for provisional attachment against the Defendant of the non-party company under Seoul Central District Court 2012Kadan47484, with respect to the claim for the price of the instant construction work against the Defendant of the non-party company, the provisional attachment of the claim was made on September 18, 2012, and the decision reached the Defendant on September 20, 2012, and the Plaintiff A filed an application for provisional attachment against the Defendant of the non-party company under Seoul Central District Court 2012Kadan3745, with respect to the claim for the construction work price of each of the instant construction work against the Defendant of the non-party company, and the decision was made on September 26, 2012.

(hereinafter) The foregoing two provisional attachment ruling was “each of the instant provisional attachment ruling”. B and the Plaintiff filed an application with Nonparty Company for a payment order claiming payment of each of the instant goods payment claims with the Incheon District Court 2013 tea17650 (hereinafter “Seoul District Court”) on March 20, 2013, and the cited decision was finalized on April 18, 2013.

B, after the death on December 30, 2014, during the instant lawsuit was pending, the wife C, D, E, and F, who were the wife, was co-inheritors, and taken over the lawsuit.

below, they and plaintiffs A.