On April 24, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment and one year and two months of imprisonment at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc. on July 20, 2014, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on July 20, 2014. On November 16, 2017, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced the Defendant to four years of imprisonment for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 23th of the same month.

1. On September 1, 2014, the Defendant of Lone Star Co., Ltd. is the representative director of the building company C, who is a building company, from around September 1, 2014 to the date of the construction company. On August 1, 2015, the victim E, the owner of the said D building, who was aware of it with the geographical introduction, was the owner of the said D building, and the victim E, the owner of the said D building, who was aware of it with the geographical introduction, intends to build an urban residential house of 140 square meters in four lots, such as G with the city population at the time of tolerance.

In all cases, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport accepted the authorization and permission documents for the current viewing of the housing construction project, and applied for the loan to the bank as security.

On the completion of the housing after 1-2 years, the net profit would be presumed to be KRW 8 billion, and if a joint investment occurs, (b) profits would be divided by half the profits. If only the name of the party is lent, it would be responsible for purchasing two vehicles from the modern automobile and paying the installment, and both the registration and operation of the vehicle.

In addition, it is necessary to purchase the iron bars to be used for the above housing construction project, and it is necessary to set up a mortgage on the D building owned by the party, and to apply for a PF loan to the Jeju-do bank.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the defendant's sales type did not have a representative director of the F Co., Ltd., and no business was delegated to the defendant by the F Co., Ltd., and there was no fact that the defendant applied for authorization or permission related to urban-type residential housing business in H with the wife population H or applied for a PF loan to the bank.