beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.05.17 2018고단742

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A leased the office Nos. 2 and Nos. 101 and No. 102 for the second time of the building C in Gyeongnam Kim-si, and had six rooms in the room, and had a carper, after employing a female employee with the nationality of the Thailand, he would operate the "D". Defendant B would like to receive monthly pay 2.5 million won from Defendant A at the said commercial sex acts establishments, work as an employee, and to instruct customers who find in the said commercial sex acts establishments and receive commercial sex acts.

On December 20, 2017, the Defendants conspired to receive 150,000 won of the sexual traffic from the customers who found the place at the above sexual traffic business establishment, and had the female employees E, F (E, F) sexual intercourse with the above customers, as well as had them sexual intercourse with the above customers. From the beginning of December 2017 to December 20, 2017, the Defendants arranged sexual traffic by having four customers receive the price for sexual traffic from the above customers and let them sexual intercourse with the above customers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to G, H, E, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of control site and investigation reports;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic for the relevant criminal facts, Articles 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. (Defendant A);

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment (Defendant A) are crimes that impair sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing sex.

The Defendants seem to have the attitude of reflecting their wrongness.

Benefits acquired by the Defendants are significant

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Defendants have no record of punishment for the same kind of crime.

As the Defendants did not repeat again, they found a new occupation.

(b) other.