However, from the date of the conclusion of the judgment, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

On June 11, 2016, at around 22:09, the Defendants reported the above main points to 112, the business owners and disputes arising from the drinking value.

The Defendants continued to be urged from G to resolve the problem of conversation with L, who was called up upon the above report by L, and Defendant A assaulted F with F, “F, f, to resolve the drinking value,” with the right hand hand hand hand hand hand, and Defendant B used F’s chest to have the right hand hand hand hand hand hand, and Defendant B used F, “F, to have f, to have f, to have f, to have f, to have f, to have f, to have f, to have f, to have f., to have f., to have f., to have f., to have f., to have f., to have f., to have f., to have f., to have f. hand hand hand hand hand.”

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to H and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (related to attachment of a copy of work log in the E District and a police officer identification card);

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment regarding criminal facts: The Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment.

1. Defendants under suspended sentence: The reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code [the scope of recommending sentence] [the scope of obstruction of performance of official duties] and the basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) (the special person) (the decision of sentence] (the decision of sentence] that there is no sentence: there are several criminal records against the Defendants.

The defendants reflect their depth in light of the favorable circumstances.

There is no criminal conviction for the Defendants.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the trial process of this case, such as the defendants' age, character and conduct, environment, motive and background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.