A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed against Defendant A for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A

A. At night, around 00:30 on October 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) intruded into the front door of the building through the entrance opened in Gwangju-si, a new building located in Gwangju-si; and (b) carried out a 150 fresh 150 building at the market price owned by the victim E, who was loaded for construction work.

B. A thief (1) around May 5, 2015, the Defendant came to front of a new building located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si. Around 01:40 on May 5, 2015, the Defendant came to have five stalves, which are building materials equivalent to KRW 200,00,00, at the market price owned by the injured Party G, for the construction work. (2) The Defendant went to the front of a new building located in the Gyeonggi-si, Gwangju-si at around 23:30 on July 2015, the Defendant came to have 50 stalves, which is a building material equivalent to KRW 1.8 million, the market

3 around 22:30 on October 26, 2015, the Defendant came to work at the construction site of JJJ in Gwangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, and 275,000 won, which is a building material owned by a victim K, the market price of which is 2,5,000 won.

2. Defendant B is a person engaged in the lease and sale of building materials with the trade name called M in Gwangju L at the Gyeonggi-si.

Around May 2015, the Defendant purchased 600,000 won of the market value of the above victims, which he stolen from the Defendant, from the Defendant, from the Defendant. In such a case, the Defendant, despite the fact that the Defendant had a duty of care to verify the personal information of the Defendant, the process of acquiring the her her lopp, etc., and to verify whether the lopp is the loppy, he/she acquired the loppy from the negligence on the part of the Defendant, instead of neglecting the duty of care on the loppy.

B. From June 2015, the Defendant stated in paragraph (1) that the market value of the above victims, which he stolen from Defendant A, was equivalent to 600,000 won.