However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving CL125S Oba.

On January 19, 2018, the Defendant driven the upper part of the area above 21:55, and continued the intersection in front of 3 p.m. 8 p.m. 6 p. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si, to the upper part of the parallel distance from the m.m. 3 p.m.

At this point, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed and a crosswalk is installed on the front side, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle to the person engaged in driving service in accordance with the new code and to build the crosswalk, and to ensure that there was a person who gets on the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with the occupational negligence of disregarding and proceeding the signal of the front stop, which led from the right side of the Defendant’s proceeding to the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the victim D (W, 66 years old) who dried the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals, from the left side of the Defendant’s direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s occupational negligence, such as pressure pressure at approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on a traffic accident;

1. Each internal investigation report and investigation report (the No. 12,14,26 of the evidence list);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 and 6, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (Selection of Imprisonment without prison labor);

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., “reasons for sentencing” as follows)

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order and order to attend a lecture is sufficient for the victim who was a normally collapse of the crosswalk in the front section of the road, by negligence, while violating the signal apparatus and signal at the intersection where the defendant is installed, and violating the duty to protect pedestrians in the crosswalk.