Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that all of the facts charged against the Defendant was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending the legal principles on the defense of a political party, without exhausting all necessary deliberations.

In addition, the part of the grounds for appeal by the Defendant’s submission of the grounds for appeal stating that “the crime of this case was committed in the state of mental or physical loss or mental weakness (e.g., the state of sobreath or mental disorder)” is only stated, and the part that “the Defendant committed the crime of this case in the state of mental or physical loss or mental weakness (e.g., the state of sobreath or mental disorder),” which does not state specific grounds for violation of the law,

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.