However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

On November 1, 2011, the Defendant, at around 23:48, was driven by the victim C(53 years of age) on the road for the Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Dried Do, the Defendant, on the ground that the victim would have changed the taxi fee and the victim would have already paid the taxi fee and

As a result, the defendant tried to provide the victim with approximately four weeks' medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (as to attachment of an injury diagnosis report);

1. Relevant Articles of criminal facts: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the defendant has no same criminal record and has no criminal record of imprisonment for a period exceeding one month, that the defendant has been detained in one month, that the defendant must be placed as soon as possible for the deceased while being detained, that 30,000 won has been deposited for the victim);

1. Dismissal of an application for compensation: The defendant's assertion as to the defendant's assertion under Article 32 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings (Dismissal of an application for compensation because there is no material to know the amount of damage inflicted by the victim) is alleged to have been in the state of mental disorder or mental disorder under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime of this case. According to the records, the defendant is acknowledged to have drinking at the time of the crime of this case, but he did not have the ability or decision-making ability to discern things in light of the defendant's ordinary amount of noise, the background leading up to the crime, the means and

Since it is not recognized that the defendant was in a state or weak condition, the above assertion by the defendant is rejected.