Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Although the Defendant stated the facts charged in the facts charged around September 3, 2013 as “ around April 17, 2013,” it is evident that it is a clerical error in the facts charged, according to the records.

At the court of Chuncheon District Court 302, the 2013da4479, the plaintiff C and the defendant D, who had been present as a witness in the compensation case between the plaintiff C and the above court of 2013Gada479, and made a testimony.

1. In the above case, the Defendant: (a) there was an occurrence of KRW 100 million from around 2008 to around 2009; (b) in fact, the Defendant did not have the ability to pay the fraternity to the fraternity members because of the failure to implement the project thereafter; (c) the Plaintiff’s attorney’s questioning by the Plaintiff’s attorney did not have the ability to pay the fraternity members at the time; and (d) the witness’s statement was written in 24 to 5 pages of the evidence No. 5; and (c) the Defendant did not appear to be “the question of the Plaintiff’s attorney’s ability to pay”. The Defendant testified that it was not during the period, but the Defendant had the ability to pay the fraternity.

2. In the above case, the Defendant testified that “the witness was organized by the Plaintiff’s attorney at the Plaintiff’s inquiry” and continued to organize three times from July 10, 2009 to May 10, 2012, in order to prepare the guidance of the witness previously operated, and to give priority to the repayment of the increase in the number of the individual business.

The reason why the number system was previously created was previously organized in order to give priority to the repayment of debts and personal projects necessary for the provision of time deposits by the fraternity operated by the system.

3.3 【Statement of this case’

“...... the Plaintiff’s attorney.”