When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around August 20, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would work as an employee from the Eda operated by the victim in the Dagjin-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, U.S. by phoneing the victim C to the effect that the Defendant would work as an employee.

However, even if the defendant received the advance payment from the victim, the defendant did not intend to work in the above Eda.

The Defendant received 500,000 won on the same day, 130,000 won on the 24th of the same month, 2370,000 won on the 25th of the same month, and 3 million won on the 25th of the same month.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of C's accusation (including copies of identification cards attached thereto and details of transactions) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The main sentence of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;