beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.04.25 2013고단1196

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 7, 2008, the Defendant proposed that “the victim F of Seongbuk-gu Seoul apartment complex shall invest 40 million won of the members of the Seoul Dongdaemun-gu G apartment association (a certificate necessary for the purchase of reconstructed apartment after the members of the association) in a unit of 80 million won and resell the unit of the profits after the purchase of the unit of 80 million won and then divide the profits therefrom.” It is clear that the victim’s purchase price in the bill of indictment on November 7, 2008 is a clerical error of “the date of November 8, 2008” as stated in the bill of indictment on November 7, 2008.

In addition to receiving KRW 20 million from a national bank account (H) in the name of the suspect, while receiving KRW 30 million around November 14, 2008, including KRW 10 million around December 8, 2008, and storing KRW 33 million for the victim, the person was arbitrarily consumed for private use without returning the amount to the victim even though the person was requested to return the amount because the person was not purchasing the Dobbbbbb area.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

around February 2009, the Defendant, together with the Victim F, invested with the victim F, operated the Ka Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa Pa PaP

On February 16, 2009, the Defendant deposited KRW 20 million from the victim F to the above national bank account under the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant at the scene of the Seocho-gu Seoul International Carbook Corporation, and deposited KRW 5 million on February 26, 200, and the same year.

3.6.5 million won deposited on June 5.5 million won and being kept in custody for business purposes in total as capital;

2. 16. The above partner embezzled 23,879,076 won in total over 30 times from that time to March 10, 2009, including the Defendant’s arbitrary use of KRW 3 million as the Defendant’s debt repayment amount.

Summary of Evidence

"2013 Highest 1196"

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statement of witness F and J in the third protocol of trial 1.