A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and for one year and six months, respectively.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A, B은 함께, 2016. 7. 1. 18:45 경 울산 중구 다운동 779-5에 있는 버스 정류장 앞 노상에서 택시를 기다리던 중, 피고인 A은 아무런 이유 없이 술에 취하여 그곳에 정차해 있던 피해자 E(57 세) 이 운행하는 F 택시의 조수석 문짝을 발로 찼고, 이에 위 택시에서 내려 항의를 하는 피해자와 서로 멱살을 잡아 흔들면서 시비하였고, 피고인 B도 이에 합세하여 피해자의 멱살을 잡아 흔들고, 피해자에게 떠밀려 바닥에 넘어지자 화가 나 들고 있던 위험한 물건인 접이 식 우산으로 피해자의 오른쪽 눈 부위를 1회 내리쳤다.

As a result, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victims, and Defendant B carried dangerous objects and caused the victims to the real name of a permanent well-being by causing injury to the victims, such as external depression, which requires four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. CCTV storage CDs at the scene of crime;

1. Investigation report (including photographs and photographs of seized articles);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (including a medical certificate) (including a medical certificate);

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts;

A. Defendants: Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: Articles 258-2 and 258(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (Defendant B) the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reduction of volume (Defendant B) Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution include not only the victim’s daily life and health but also the victim’s vocational ability as a transport engineer on the ground that it is difficult for the defendants to understand the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.