When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On May 10, 2016, the Defendant, at the victim C’s house located in Incheon Reinforcement-gun, intends to purchase materials while performing roof improvement works, and to lend 300,000 won due to the shortage of the funds, and to complete the payment immediately in receipt of the down payment.

“A false representation was made.”

However, the defendant did not have any specific income and did not have any intention or ability to pay the money in advance even if he borrowed the money from the injured party after the completion of the construction work.

The Defendant received 300,000 won in cash from the injured party as the borrowed money.

2. On May 23, 2016, the Defendant, at the construction site of the Defendant’s work site located in Incheon Strengthening-gun, will pay the victim the amount of “one million won per materials shortage” to the victim after the completion of the construction site.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, as the Corporation is already in progress at the time of being hostilely, there was no intention or ability to pay the money in full even if it borrowed money from the injured party.

The Defendant received from the injured party one million won in cash as the borrowed money.

3. The defendant around June 9, 2016, at the defendant's house located in Incheon Strengthening-gun E and the defendant's house located in A 303 Dong Dong Dong, "for work, it is insufficient to lend the cateral equipment, 500,000 won to the victim, and the defendant will pay 1.8 million won in a lump sum after the completion of the site.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant had already been liable for the debt due to gambling and could receive the construction cost after the completion of the construction, and there was no intention or ability to repay within a certain period of time, even if he borrowed money from the injured party.

The Defendant received 50,000 won in cash from the injured party.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim three times in total.