대여금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,000,000 and annual interest thereon from July 1, 2017 to July 12, 2017 to the Plaintiff.
Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments in Gap evidence 1 and No. 6-1 and No. 6-2, the plaintiff lent KRW 40 million to the defendant on June 2015 without due date, and the plaintiff demanded the defendant to repay the above loan to the first police officer on May 30, 2017, it is recognized that the plaintiff respondeded to the plaintiff on June 30, 2017, and the defendant's personal examination result is not believed, and each statement in Eul's evidence No. 1 through No. 4 does not interfere with the above recognition.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 40 million won and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum prescribed by the Civil Act from July 1, 2017 to July 12, 2017 and 15% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.