2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and against the mistake, and that some of the damaged items have been returned to the victim.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant throughout 12 times, and the victim is many and the amount of damage is high, and the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes on December 6, 2011 and committed the crime of this case even though he had completed the execution of punishment on October 14, 201, and even if he had been repeated period on October 14, 2014, the crime of this case was committed at another time, and most damages have not been recovered, considering the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, means and method of the crime, and the circumstances after the sentence of the court below, the punishment of this case and the sentencing conditions stated in the argument and the record are too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.