1. On December 12, 2013, the Defendant injured by robbery on December 12, 2013: around 00:50, the Defendant followed the victim in order to find out that the victim E (she was 42 years of age) was booming on the street in front of the Domoel located in Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and to take back the said victim’s bank.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who had the victim returned to the Defendant, prevented the victim from resisting against the victim by taking the victim’s face one time by drinking it, and then deducted the victim from cash 215,000 won, and cosmetics containing cosmetics (the market price equivalent to 50,00 won), and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the number of days of treatment by cutting off the dubs and the dubs of the dubs.

2. The Defendant injured by robbery on December 17, 2013: around 02:10 on December 17, 2013, the victim G (n, 47 years old) discovered that he/she had his/her house in the street near Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and followed the victim to take handbags of the said victim.

Accordingly, in order for the victim to open his house and close the door door, the defendant opened the door door and made the victim's face drinking so that the victim could not resist, and then 20,000 won in cash, 1 mobile phone (on a market price of 90,000 won), 1 mobile phone (on a market price of 90,000 won), 20,000 won in cash, 20,000 won in identification card, and 50,000 won in verification Handbag (on a market price of 50,000 won) owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs, photographs of victims, victim photographs and field photographs;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 337 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the aggravation of concurrent crimes with the punishment stipulated for the crime of robbery and bodily injury as of December 17, 2013, heavier penalty) among concurrent crimes;

1. The sentencing of discretionary mitigation is based on Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing).