In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Defendant

A is a person who operates a marina business with the trade name "D" from the 3rd floor of Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and Defendant B is an employee employed at the same marina business.

1. No person who has no eligibility to engage in job-seeking activities shall employ any person;

Nevertheless, from January 2019 to February 20, 2019, the Defendant employed the E and F as an employee of a marina business establishment with the nationality of Thailand who was issued a tourist visa and did not have a qualification to engage in job-seeking activities.

2. On February 20, 2019, Defendant B: (a) received the price for sexual traffic in accordance with the courses, such as KRW 60,000 to KRW 130,00,00 from many unspecified male customers who found their places at the above establishment; and (b) mediated sexual traffic by having female employees E and F do the similarity act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. On-site photographs;

1. Requests for cooperation with investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the foreigner's letter of transfer and takeover;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Selection of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act recognize the Defendants’ mistake, and the Defendants did not have the same criminal record, and the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the commission of the crime shall be determined by taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendants’ age, character and conduct,