위증
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. The summary of the facts charged was that the Defendant stolen the deposit by using a debit card owned by C from October 31, 2009 to September 1, 201 without C’s permission, and on July 29, 201, the Incheon District Court sentenced a fine of KRW 2,50,000 to a fine of KRW 2,50,000, and the said judgment became final and conclusive (Seoul District Court Decision 201No. 37). D was the relative of the above C, who was present as a witness of the Defendant in the instant case, and was tried with the suspicion of the above suspicion.
At around 15:00 on December 13, 201, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s perjury case in the Incheon District Court No. 316 of the Incheon District Court No. 316 of the Nam-gu Incheon District Court No. 163, which was located in 163, Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, and 201.
The Defendant testified as “for example,” to the question of “A’s permission prior to withdrawal of money at the time,” and testified as “for example, whether C, at the time of the agreement, allowed the witness to pay the fine for negligence of Dob taxi by one bank or debit card” to the witness on November 2009.
In fact C did not agree to withdraw a deposit by using his debit card at the time of agreement with the defendant around November 8, 2009.
Ultimately, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
2. In light of the various circumstances indicated in C’s written statement of each witness examination protocol and a copy of police statement corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case, C’s written statement of the written statement of the written statement of the C, and the written statement of C in the written statement of the investigation report (to listen to the phone statement of the relevant witness), which are the same as the facts charged in the instant case, the written verdict of innocence (Evidence 5 and Incheon District Court Decision 2012No561 Decided July 19, 2012, Supreme Court Decision 2012No561 Decided April 11, 2013, which became final and conclusive by the dismissal of the final appeal on April 11, 2013 (see Supreme Court Decision 2012Do9726).