However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around September 29, 2018, the Defendant posted a statement to the effect that “The Defendant would send the goods to the victim C who reported and contacted with the fact that, despite having no intention or ability to deliver the goods promised to receive money from others as the price for the goods, the Defendant would sell the goods on the Internet B website,” and that “the remittance of the price to the victim C” would be “the sending of the goods.”

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 441,400 from the victim’s bank account under the name of the Defendant on the same day, and acquired KRW 3,326,400 in total from around that day to November 12, 2018 by remitting KRW 3,326,400 as the price for goods through the same method between the victim and the victim’s account in the same manner.

around October 10, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “The 2019 Highest 269” means that “the cood cood scood scood scood scoods are sold” on the Internet B website and “the cood cood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scood scoods

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 700,00 from the victim to the G account in the name of F on the same day, and acquired KRW 1,569,600 in total from around that time to October 27, 2018 by means of the same manner as indicated in the attached crime list in the same manner, and acquired KRW 1,569,60 from the victims as goods price.

around October 24, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “The Internet I website sell mobile phone 8” on the Internet I website at the Daejeon-gu HMomoel, Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and that “on the part of the victim J who reported and contacted, remittance of the price shall be an object.”