A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

B is not guilty.

Defendant

A is a member of the "E" church located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

Defendant

A around 17:00 on December 13, 2012, at the restaurant of “E” church located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, on the ground that F’s G (14 years of age)’s son G (14 years of age) asked F (F) to receive decoration from F (F) who was the believers of the above church and stolen the church donation and went out of the game, the victim’s arms, legs, and am out of the game, priceed the body of the victim’s shack pipe (120cm in length), and added approximately four weeks of treatment to the victim.

As a result, Defendant A committed abusive acts that inflict bodily harm on a child.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement made by a witness H in the second trial records;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Medical certificate (six pages of the evidence record) and photograph (Evidence No. 8-12) (Evidence No. 8-12) bound to request an investigation of child abuse acts (Evidence No. 6) [Defendant A asserted that the mother F of the victim who is not himself/herself was the victim when the victim was the victim. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by compiling the evidence, namely, ① the victim was discovered by the police who belongs to the police station that belongs to the Seoul East Police Station, and the Seoul East Children Protection Agency (Seoul East Children Protection Agency) was established

) From consulting with H to December 13, 2012, the Defendant’s consistently stated that he/she was the Defendant A, and ② Although the Seoul East Children’s Protection Agency’s request for investigation and the H’s written statement attached to the said written request (Records No. 13) are written as if the Victim B was in accord with the Defendant on December 13, 2013, H who prepared the said written request for investigation and the said written statement are expressed that the victim was in accord with the Defendant on December 15, 2013. < Amended by Act No. 11718, Dec. 15, 2013>

After the lapse of time, it was expressed that it was against Defendant B.