2. In full view of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant made a confession of all the crimes, and the economic difficulties led to the crime, and the fact that there was a history of criminal punishment for the defendant several times including the criminal committed in the same kind as the crime of this case, criminal fraud and the criminal record committed in the same manner as the crime of this case by special larceny, and in particular, the fraud committed against the victim B was committed during the suspended execution period, and in light of the background, method, and consequence of the crime of theft by deceiving victims of the crime by deceiving them to commit the crime of larceny and making them enter into another's residence, it is not good that the crime of this case is not committed, although the defendant argued that the damage was recovered, the defendant did not submit the materials to recognize it, but failed to reach an agreement with the victims because the remaining victims were not completely recovered, and all other circumstances that form the conditions of sentencing specified in the records, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the judgment below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.