If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On March 15, 2017, from around 20:50 to around 21:30, the Defendant demanded “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Seopoposi City from around 20:50 to from around 21:30, that “I am in the place, and I am in accordance with drinking.” However, the Defendant’s refusal of the demand that “I am am in the place, I am am in the victim, I am am off and discarded off. I am off, I am out of the c

“The victim’s cafeteria was expressed as “ and interfered with the victim’s operation of the restaurant by force, by taking advantage of the victim’s disturbance, such as taking the victim’s left side part of the victim’s leaving side and soliciting the Defendant to return home.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment shall be taken into account all of the conditions for sentencing specified in the argument in the instant case, and in particular, the circumstances that reflect the following circumstances: The circumstances that are favorable to consider the following circumstances; and the circumstances that the victim does not want the punishment: The fact that there was a history of having been punished several times for