손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the defendant against the plaintiff A, C, and H exceeding the amount ordered to be paid below.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing this case, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the allegations made by the plaintiff Q and the defendant in the court, as stated in paragraph (2) or paragraph (3). Thus, this is acceptable as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance 6 to 9 is reversed as follows.
(A) Personal information and operating period of Plaintiff A1) : “Income” as stated below : Urban Daily Wage (hereinafter the remaining Plaintiffs shall apply the same unit wage) and 22 days of operation / [basic matters / 22 days / 2017 or80 case number / Defendant A’s gender (i.e., male 1 and female 2) of the type of sexual injury A (i.e., 2017 or 23 years of age 23 and 84.85 years of age 201-3-26 on the date of the occurrence of the accident in 2047-7-23 (tax) 60 C) and the rate of loss of working ability: Unless it is clearly recognized that the treatment was lost due to an accident in question 20% of the total or 9% of the number of days of hospitalization or the number of days of operation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 90% of the case’s injury or injury during the period of hospitalization).