물품대금
1. The Defendant shall pay KRW 34,957,80 to the Plaintiff the annual rate of KRW 15% from July 16, 2016 to the day of full payment.
In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff, who runs the small wholesale business, supplied the defendant with food materials, such as vegetables, to the defendant who runs the food materials distribution business, and the defendant, on May 26, 2016, agreed to pay the plaintiff a total of KRW 34,957,80,00 for the price for the above goods transaction.
According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 34,957,80 won and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from July 16, 2016 to the date of full payment, which is obvious that the copy of the complaint of this case was served to the defendant, as requested by the plaintiff.
On the other hand, the defendant asserts that the total amount of the goods price stated in the above Gap evidence No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the above letter of payment") was wrong, but the defendant merely sent the above amount by facsimile with a seal affixed to the defendant's name. Thus, the above amount cannot be paid.
On the other hand, there is no evidence to deem that the defendant raised an objection against the amount stated in the letter of this case, and as long as the authenticity of the disposal document is recognized, the existence and contents of the declaration of intent according to the contents of the document should be recognized. Since each of the contracts of this case was prepared by the defendant's genuine intent, and the objective meaning of the text is clear, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the price for the goods under each of the contracts of this case.
The defendant's argument is without merit.
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and it is so decided as per Disposition.