When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2014. 7. 23. 22:10경 평택시 C에 있는 ‘D’ 주점에서 ‘피고인이 술에 취해 소란을 피우고 있다’는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 경찰관인 평택경찰서 E파출소 소속 경장 F(25세)으로부터 경범죄처벌법위반으로 인한 범칙금 통고서를 발부받자 화가 나 위 경찰관에게 “이게 뭐야, 개새끼야, 안 받아, 씹새끼야, 내가 뭘 잘못했냐, 이 씨발놈아”라고 욕을 하며, 손으로 범칙금 통고서를 구겨 잡은 채 경찰관의 가슴부위를 밀치고 상의를 낚아채 잡아당기는 등으로 폭행하여 경찰관의 범죄 예방 및 단속에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Seoul Southern District Court rendered a sentence of one year and six months to the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on November 22, 2012, for the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Seoul Southern District Court on parole on August 14, 2013 during the execution of the sentence, and committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime after the execution of the sentence on October 25, 2013, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant in light of the fact that the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime after the execution of the sentence on October 25, 2013. However, although the defendant appears to have an attitude against his/her mistake, some money for the victimized police officers are deposited, not for a repeated crime of the same kind, but for a crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties. It is so decided as per Disposition by taking account of the