2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the mistake, that the defendant did not have any criminal records exceeding the same kind of crime or fine, and that the defendant suffered from the troke-Barael.

However, in full view of the following facts: (a) the instant fraud crime committed by the Defendant was planned by acquiring funds by means of the capital loan system for workers; and (b) there is no change in circumstances in relation to the recovery of the damage in relation to the victim after the issuance of the lower judgment; and (c) other factors of sentencing indicated in the record and the theory of change, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable, as it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.