However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 7, 2017, at the D points of the victim C’s operation located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S. on March 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was punished for dispute as a bad and bad among one’s daily dialogue with E; and (b) the two customers who found to find out of the said main points without any justifiable reason, “h, h, and h, h, h.h., h. to h. to h.m.

“Along with the body of the said victim, the said victim interfered with the main business of the said victim by force, such as harming the said victim’s body and harming the said victim’s body and breaking out and cutting down clothes.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, upon receiving a report from 112 to the effect that he gets home from a policeman in charge of a police box in the Ulsan Namnam Police Station, which was called out after having been reported to the effect that 112 of the date, time, place, and “hings who take the alcohol,” the Defendant took a bath to “hing, singing, and sing down the law,” and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the duty of reporting and handling 112 by assaulting him to “hing, sing, and sing down the law,” with his hand, prices the left face of the said G, and walking on the left side of the said G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of each police statement protocol to C, G, and E

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the selection of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (referring to the part of favorable circumstances for sentencing as follows):

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple crimes in the mitigation area (one to eight months), the mitigation area (including a special mitigation person), the mitigation area (including a serious effort to recover damage) of the mitigation area (including a special mitigation person), the punishment exemption area), the reduction area (including a serious effort to recover damage) of the punishment area) of the punishment exemption area (including a serious effort to recover damage): June to October 1 to October 1:

2. Determination of sentence: