2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The parties to the case 1) The defendant is a Gunsan S apartment complex in the Simsan-si, Simsan-si (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

A) A housing association established pursuant to the Housing Act and subordinate statutes to implement a construction project. (2) The Plaintiffs are several buyers who purchased the instant apartment.

B. 1) In the case of Plaintiff A, B, C, and D Plaintiff D, the wife entered into a sales contract with the union member under the name of U.S. In the case of the Plaintiff A, B, C, and D, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the Defendant to allocate each of the same subparagraph in the “object” as indicated in the attached Table among the apartment buildings in this case. However, the said Plaintiffs were confirmed to be ineligible as a union member after entering into the membership agreement with the Defendant, and lost their status as a union member. Since then, the said Plaintiffs were to have the same amount as stated in the attached Table “sale price” as stated in the attached Table “the date of entering into the sales contract with the Defendant as indicated in the attached Table,” and written an apartment supply contract with the Defendant on each of the relevant days as stated in the attached Table “the date of entering into the sales contract with the Plaintiff,” stating that the amount of the apartment house in this case was to be sold to the union member at an amount equivalent to that stated in the attached Table No. 5, but the Plaintiff’s respective apartment sale contract was not entered in the attached sheet No. 2.

The plaintiffs concluded each contract with the defendant for the sale of each unit.