2. The judgment is deemed to have committed the instant perjury in order to escape from liability to oneself, and it appears that the Defendant had no intention to make C disadvantageously in the relevant trial. The Defendant appears to have not significantly affected the decision on whether to punish C and the degree of the testimony made by him/her appears to have been given; the Defendant confessions and reflects the instant crime in the first instance trial; the Defendant’s motive and motive leading up to the instant crime; his/her relationship with C; the details of perjury; the circumstances leading up to the instant crime; circumstances leading up to the instant crime; the Defendant’s age, character and conduct; the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and criminal records; and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the arguments and arguments, do not seem to be unfair; thus, the Prosecutor’s assertion is without merit.

3. Therefore, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.