beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.02.02 2017나3076

손해배상

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) around August 29, 2012, the Plaintiff’s husband C filed a civil petition with the Ministry of Health and Welfare through a national newspaper and mail receipt on the ground that E received an unjust solicitation between December 28, 2015 and March 14, 2016, and the Defendant, who is a public official of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, received an unjust solicitation from D and E, received a false request and gave rise to the Plaintiff’s loss due to the removal of the said petition, etc., as the Defendant, who received a false request from the Plaintiff, and responded to the Plaintiff as well as the damages incurred to the Plaintiff due to the Plaintiff, 1 million won, and the late payment damages should be paid to the Plaintiff.

B. According to each statement of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the number of branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), around December 28, 2015, C filed a civil petition with the purport that E was required to make a thorough investigation by illegal solicitation, and the Ministry of Health and Welfare also received a petition and evidential materials to the same purport by mail, and the Ministry of Health and Welfare and the defendant, who is a public official of the Ministry of Health and Welfare, is not able to take measures under the Medical Service Act. The plaintiff filed a civil petition through a national newspaper by asserting that the defendant who responded as above, received an illegal solicitation on January 25, 2016, and the defendant did not take measures that can be taken under the Medical Service Act, and the defendant did not properly deal with the affairs of the Ministry of Health and Welfare around March 14, 2016.

참조조문