A. At the time of misunderstanding the fact, the Defendant: (a) at the bus stops, the victim was fluored with the victim in a large lusent manner, such as “the victim was flusium in this Decree,” and was flusent with the Defendant’s neck, inside, and inside, the inner diameter; and (b) during the bus stops, the Defendant was tightly contacted with the victim in a way that the victim was able to take aboard the bus at the bus; and (c) there was no injury case.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (one million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. As to the assertion of mistake of facts, in full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the defendant injured the victim as shown in the facts charged.

The judgment of the court below is just and there is no error of mistake of facts as alleged by the defendant or his defense counsel (the defendant's act does not constitute a legitimate act, such as a justifiable act or defense of a political party, since he actively inflicted an injury upon the victim by exercising his physical force during the process of disputing the victim). 1) The defendant's act of drinking alcohol is acknowledged as the defendant's act of drinking alcohol and body fighting in the police.

I write down the low-level timber.

The phrase "(40 pages of evidence records)" and "I do not see which desire to do so with the view of drinking."

In the end of this period of time, I would like to hear the end of this period of time and the desire to do so more severe.

“(Evidence No. 42 pages)”, “Many woman’s debrison in the territory of the Republic of Korea (Evidence No. 42 pages)”, “A woman’s debrison in the territory of the Republic of Korea.”

“Evidence 46 pages of evidence.”