1. On September 27, 2016, the Defendant, at around 01:15, was under investigation by the N District Team located in Sungnam-si M in Sung-si, Sungnam-si, on the charge of assaulting other customers, and was under investigation to avoid punishment, and was under investigation as one’s child “O” in order to avoid punishment, the Defendant stated “O” in the front column of the horse of the written consent of voluntary accompanying.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

2. The Defendant issued the aforementioned written consent of voluntary accompanying P as if he/she was duly formed, at the time, at a place specified in paragraph 1, and at the place, as if he/she were aware of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised his signature of a forged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written consent to voluntary accompanying (Evidence Nos. 3);

1. A report on investigation (verification of personal information of a suspect);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and a report on investigation (report on confirmation of the facts during the period of suspension of execution);

1. Article 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes are recognized and contradictory to the Defendant. However, the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspended execution due to interference with official duties, etc. However, in light of the fact that, as a result of the crime of assault, it is apprehended that the Defendant would be perceived as being a person’s signature during the period of suspended execution when he was voluntarily accompanied to the earth, the Defendant may forge and use another’s signature during the period of suspended execution.