However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 20:25 on September 7, 2017, 2017, when she was divingd by a c district unit in the Gangseo-si Police Station C district unit in Gangnam-si B, the Defendant: (b) expressed that she was able to invalid home; (c) she was able to take the fluor; (d) she was able to take the fluor’s hand on two occasions, she was able to take the fluor’s hand on two occasions; and (e) she was able to walk the fluor’s right buckbbbbbbing part at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), and at the place specified in the above paragraph (1), thereby damaging things used by public offices, by walking the hand of the Defendant, which cited mobile phones for business purposes, so that the said cell phone amounting to KRW 50,000,000, away from the floor of the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report, investigative report (Attachment, such as site photographs), and investigation report (referring to determining the amount of damage inflicted on public goods);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Articles 136(1) (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and 141(1) (the point of damaging goods for public use) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence are the primary offender against his/her mistake, the degree of violence against public officials and the degree of damage to public goods, and other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, environment, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined in consideration of the overall circumstances.